5.30.2008

It's Been A While

1959: Celtics, 4-0
1962: Celtics, 4-1
1963: Celtics, 4-2
1965: Celtics, 4-1
1966: Celtics, 4-3
1968: Celtics, 4-2
1969: Celtics, 4-3
1984: Celtics, 4-3
1985: Lakers, 4-2
1987: Lakers, 4-2
2008: ???

Unhappily, my prediction is for the Lakers to win the series 4-2, but I'd love to be wrong and I'm going to try and enjoy the ride.

[UPDATE: I WAS VERY WRONG AND I AM VERY HAPPY. I DID NOT BELIEVE BUT I SHOULD HAVE. UBUNTU! Ahem.]

In the absence of serious analysis I'll point out that the Celtics have the most titles of anyone in the league, with 16, and the Lakers are right behind them with 14, that the 1959-1966 victories actually represent a run of eight consecutive Celtics titles, which is unequalled in the history of American professional sport, that former Celtics coach/patriarch Red Auerbach and current Lakers coach Phil Jackson are tied for the most championships as a coach, with nine apiece, that the Lakers have only missed the playoffs five times and despite not having the most titles have the most finals appearances, the most total wins, and the best historical winning percentage of any NBA franchise. It should also be noted that, like cowards, they intentionally lost the Western Conference Finals in 1986 so that they wouldn't have to suffer the indignity of losing to the arguably the single best team in Celtics history.

Labels:

5.28.2008

I Looked For Blackness, Holes In The Heavens: Blood Meridian

I just finished Blood Meridian about ten minutes ago. I need to think about this; times like this I wish I were still in a university community so that I could get access to JSTOR, because I'd rather like to read some criticism right now. I'm curious about scholarly impressions, but there are also some issues of interpretation; I know there's a minority opinion that attempts to question the common understanding of what happens to the kid at the end of the book, but that's not really the most important thing. For one, I have no clue what's happening in the epilogue. Literally no clue.

I first started reading the book when I was 20 or 21, but put it down after about thirty pages because I wasn't prepared for the unrelenting violence. I fought past that initial impulse this time and found it repelling yet entrancing. The detailed portrayal of violence is diminished by the novel's midpoint and nearly gone towards the end (which is why I think the elision of what precisely happened to the kid isn't a notable stylistic choice: it's the logical conclusion of the novel's growing refusal to detail scenes of violence), which is a brilliant choice: it reflects the growing unremarkability of horrific violence to the members of the Glanton gang, who were never horrified by their works but can be imagined to, at one time, have a (by our lights) morbid interest in them, yet that fades over time into dullness, and there's no more interest in the details of a man's death. It also reflects and engages our own inevitable desensitization: the most distressing passages, if I recall correctly, happen in the first half and even the first third of the book, when the reader can still be shocked by them. Then, rather than continuing to feed us images whose effect is dulled (and, perhaps kindly, wishing to spare us from learning the extent of our own desnsitization?) the novel becomes calmer even as the bodycount escalates. (I haven't read No Country For Old Men, but the film at least seems to replicate this strategy: after showing us a number of death scenes, we know what they look like, and the final acts of perpetrated violence are off screen.)

And then there is of course the judge to consider. Briefly here I'll only say that his insane terrifying philosophy of life makes for captivating prose: indeed, not having read other McCarthy I can't compare this book to his others for prose style, but the presentation and syntax are so perfect for the expression of the judge's psyche that the rest of the book's voice is as though it were molded around that form. One passage of many:

The truth about the world, [the judge] said, is that anything is possible. Had you not seen it all from birth and thereby bled it of its strangeness it would appear to you for what it is, a hat trick in a medicine show, a fevered dream, a trance bepopulate with chimeras having neither analogue nor precedent, an itinerant carnival, a migratory tentshow whose ultimate destination after many a pitch in many a mudded field is unspeakable and calamitous beyond reckoning.

Labels:

At Least They Didn't Use Tasers

So it appears that the British police detained a university student and a staff member for six days because:

The student was doing research on terrorist organizations for his masters degree in politics, accessed a 1500 page al-Qaeda training manual from a US Government website, didn't want to pay the printing fees, and emailed it to a friend who had free printing privileges (I gather) as a university staff member. Then another staff member apparently saw the document on the computer it had been printed from and freaked.

The comments over at the story pretty much cover most of the obvious and immediate reactions to this story. For my own sake, I recognize and respect the desire/need to be vigilant, and I don't think it's inappropriate for the second staff member to have alerted authorities, and if I'm getting the chain of events right, I also don't think the university was necessarily wrong in punting the investigation to law enforcement. And I'm sure the cops had/have some protocol that was implemented which led to this result, but as one of the commenters put it, the protocol shouldn't countermand the work of the Mk. 1 Human Brain. (Although, really, we're probably more on like Mk. 3.5 or something.) It shouldn't have taken six days to figure out (1) the chain of events; (2) the student's course of study; (3) the provenance of the information. So that is distressing as far as the police work goes.

What's more distressing to me than the policework, because as a bourgeoise white guy I'm more immediately invested in academic freedom than civil liberties, is the response of the University of Nottingham:

A spokesman for Nottingham confirmed that the police had been called after material was found on the computer used by a junior clerical member of staff. “There was no reasonable rationale for this person to have that information,” he said. “The police were called in on the basis of reasonable anxiety and concern. In response to that, the police made a connection with a student who, we understand, was impeding the investigation and arrested that person.”

He added that the edited version of the al-Qaeda handbook was “not legitimate research material” in the university’s view.

WHAT THE FUCK.

"There was no reasonable rationale for this person to have that information"??? I gather that they're talking here about the staff clerk and not the student, and while from a literal standpoint that makes sense, WHAT THE FUCK!!! There's no reasonable rationale for me to have bought a book on Shamanism (which I recently did), since Shamanism isn't my job, except for, you know, PERSONAL INTEREST. Again, this was PUBLIC INFORMATION posted on a FUCKING GOVERNMENT WEBSITE. (A foreign government, yes, but the USA!) This guy is a dick. As to whether the material itself was "not legitimate" as a research tool I can't say, except to wonder: was it illegitimate because it was edited? Should he have acquired an unedited (i.e., classified) copy? Even if it was inappropriate as a primary source to use in citations, is it illegitimate for background material in the student's research? How about the fact that the kid is A FUCKING STUDENT WHO WAS SEEKING OUT INFORMATION.

Look, I'm going to take a second look at some dude on the bus reading a book called How You Can Use Make Bombs With Common Household Items, but the idea that there would be no rational reason for him to have the book, or that it was illegitimate for him to be reading it, is ridiculous and frightening. If I were studying World War II, even if I were focused on the Pacific Theater, it wouldn't be crazy for me to have a copy of Mein Kampf around, would it? (Or, again, just for personal interest. Doesn't make me an anti-semite.) Or to get out of the universally despicable and into the merely distasteful, I have a copy of The Bell Curve. Now, I bought it because my university library's copies were all checked out and I was up against a deadline for a paper, but even if I didn't have such a particular reason for owning it, I might have bought it out to satisfy this dangerous human impulse called intellectual curiosity. Ownership of a book, reading a book, is indicative of curiosity and/or interest, not endorsement, and that a university official of all people would hedge against that vital fact (instead of just tossing some mealy mouthed "Mistakes Were Made" rhetoric and moving on) is disgusting.

Labels:

In The White Noise In My Head

When I was in high school I read Michael Azerrad's biography of Nirvana and remember being struck by one of the details from its recounting of Cobain's early years: as a kid, he started reading rock magazines which often covered music he'd never heard because it didn't get played on the radio or make it to the record shops where he lived, and he wound up developing a relatively involved musical fantasy world around what he thought these bands sounded like. I don't recall specifics but I think it was along the lines of imagining that New Order sounded like Sonic Youth, or something to that effect. (There's also the implication that to an extent he was trying in Nirvana to realize the sound he'd imaginatively associated with bands that in practice had nothing to do with it.)

This struck me as interesting at the time, but it's an anecdote that stayed with me because since high school it's happened more and more that I'll read about a musician and imagine what the actual music sounds like while going months without hearing it. In high school I voraciously swallowed up whatever I could find, abetted by ease of access to one of the world's great used record stores and the enthusiasm that came with a newly flowered hobby (that was also the first instance of a newly developing aspect of my personality: an obsessive drive to completism and, well, obsessiveness that I've been fighting, for the sake of my own sanity, ever since). I liked music, more or less, when I was a kid, but it only became important in my life when I was already in high school, and it did so then overnight and with a vengeance. Now, ten years later, my stamina has waned and my restlessness waxed, and I'm too fickle to spend energy and money running down some new (or new to me) musical field just because it sounds like I might be into it: I have to be powerfully moved to stir from my inertia, and I have to capture the brief window in which I really want to educate myself re: old school hip hop, because next week I'm going to be wondering about Tuvan throat singers.

Anyway, the point being that I've thereby read about a lot of music which engages my intellectual curiosity but which I haven't yet pursued aurally, which means that my ears have had a long time to gestate their own manifestation of whatever sparked my attention. (The first time this happened was when I was in college, already sliding out of intimate touch with the pulse of pop music, and spent several weeks imagining what dance punk would sound like when I actually bothered to download some mp3s: I'm still recovering from the disappointment of, in retrospect, near-impossible expectations. I really should record an album of what I thought it was going to sound like just so I have it ready and in the can for the next time that collection of trends becomes opportune.) In particular I currently have in mind the Alaskan composer John Luther Adams, profiled in the New Yorker by the estimable Alex Ross.

I've been reading about John Luther "Not That John Adams, And Not That One Either" Adams for some time, mostly at the blog of his friend Kyle Gann, but this profile renewed my imaginitive interest. I purposely haven't yet listened even to the music available at the end of the article because I'm relishing the beauty of what I hear in my head, and fearing the potential disappointment if I don't find his music as transcendently gorgeous as I hope. "The Place Where You Go Listen" is gnawing at my heart as I write.

I'm also taken by Adams' residence in Alaska; I don't share the Thoreauvian fantasy that apparently animated his younger self (in habit I'm as of yet firmly an urban creature, and I have no deep urge to chop wood and carry water), but the beauty of the wilderness, the appeal of isolation, and my own poorly detailed (because of no wood chopping, etc.) pining for cool rural simplicity like I brushed against as a child have me dreaming of settling peacefully in a place like Alaska, removed from the jackhammering pressures of modernity. So long as I can have electricity, and climate control, and indoor plumbing, and high speed internet, and the ability to get to a major metropolis should I want to.

Finally I was stirred by the moment when Adams spies a dog that "had wandered out on the ice and was howling to itself." His phrasing, bereft of the unnecessary words and hesitations and asides and qualifications with which I always, even now, burden my sentences, cuts deep and moves me the more for its simplicity:

"He has some fantasy he's a wolf."

Don't we all sometimes.

Labels:

5.27.2008

#1 Hit Ain't Good Enough

Thought of the day: the Paul Simon song "50 Ways to Leave Your Lover" would be better if Simon had actually listed the fifty ways.

This is cute, but I feel that for thematic and rhythmic consistency the list should be restricted to monosyllabic men's names. Boding ill for the title, I project that I could only come up with thirty or forty of these suitable for use in very short rhyming couplets that don't repeat a rhyme (i.e., we've already got Stan, so no Dan or Bran or Flann or Jan or Ran or Van).

I'm also very happy to report that "50 Ways to Leave Your Lover" was directly preceded as a #1 hit by "Love Rollercoaster" and directly followed by "Theme From S.W.A.T.".

Since scrolling around the page with my usual overlong posts is awkward, I'm looking for a solution in the whole "click to read more" vein but I don't like nitty details of any one yet. Shall continue pondering.

Labels: ,

5.26.2008

Alsø alsø wik:

And I think that's it for my blogging about "new to me" TV shows, at least for a while. I've actually managed not to see the entirety of the final season to any of the three great HBO dramas, but if I ever blog about those I think I'd want it to be in a more comprehensive capacity, which would at this point require a lot of rewatching as well. (Plus, honestly, I'm not exactly chomping at the bit emotionally to watch them right now.) I generally have less to say about comedies, so even though there are some I'm interested in I doubt I'd write about them, and I've essentially seen most/all the other dramas I was interested in. As a fan of David Milch I suppose I should go back and check out NYPD Blue but it's a big project for another day. Also I'm thinking I want to scale back my Netflix subscription (again) to something that would be suitable for watching movies on a regular basis but not sufficient to let me rip through TV shows the way I like to. I want to get more reading done and spend less time passively sitting at the computer, so cutting down on the whole "I watched eight hours of DVD this weekend!" would be a good start.

Plus I'm thinking about embarking on a project I've had in mind for quite some time now, where I go episode by episode through my favorite TV universe of all, probably the only one I have remotely that much to write about, and just get everything I have in my head by way of response out on paper. It's a long project, and it'll take a *lot* of writing, and it'll probably be of no interest to most of my readership, but I want to spend the time luxuriating in this show, its' spinoff, and some of the extended media, plus it'd be a major flexing of various types of critical muscles.

That's right. Coming soon: Medrawt Blogs Buffy.

Labels: ,

Welcome To The Church...Of The Aiiiiir!: Carnivàle

That's my favorite running schtick from Carnivàle, the deadpan announcer introducing Brother Justin's radio evangelism faking enthusiasm and drawing out the word "air." Made me giggle every time.

Carnivàle ran for two seasons, ensorcelled many, confused many more, got cancelled. One of the attorneys from the Medium Sized Law Firm where I used to work said it was his favorite TV show of all time, so I figured I'd finally check it out. It was the only one of the major HBO dramas (barring recent additions) I'd never seen, and I wondered whether it'd rearrange my estimation of their programming. The top three of The Sopranos, The Wire, and Deadwood are, for me, many cuts above everything else - Oz, which I managed to catch a few seasons of, Six Feet Under, the first season of which I thought was pretty good but rapidly started hating what followed, Rome, which I saw one episode of but frankly just can't get myself to care about, and so forth.

I'd say Carnivàle is somewhere in between, but closer to the second group than the cream. The production is gorgeous (well, gorgeous for the Dustbowl), and there's a texture to much of the camera work that, lacking the relevant technical information, I don't know how to describe, but I rarely see its equal on TV; by memory, my three top HBO series get there but rarely, but Battlestar Galactica seems to hit that spot a lot. The production is gorgeous and the acting is first-rate, especially Clancy Brown as Brother Justin Crow and Michael J. Anderson as Samson. The show also featured, in two major roles and one minor recurring role, three bit players from Seinfeld: Bizarro Jerry (Tim DeKay, fantastic as Jonesy, ex-baseball player and leader of the roustabouts), The Wiz (Toby Huss, fantastic as Stumpy, paterfamilias of the cooch show), and Lloyd "Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?" Braun (Matt McCoy, fantastic at...looking like Lloyd Braun). And everyone else is good, even Meatloaf's daughter (seriously).

It's the writing. Oh, the writing. The pace of the show is glacial. (OK, so I'm going to start with the editing.) On a basic level, there are long moments of silence meant to create suspense, or meaning, or just atmosphere, and sometimes they work but often they bore. When - look, spoilers are going to abound, in case anyone's curious I'll try to avoid the truly essential revelations, but plot points are going to get mentioned - when Jonesy reveals that his injured knee is healed, the scene feels like it takes forever, like it actually takes the amount of time it would take a real person to undo all the laces on a leg brace and remove it. The audience already knows the knee is healed, so we feel no suspense, just boredom. This is elementary filmmaking; you get economy and a sense of narrative thrust if you show him starting to untie the laces and then cut to him removing the brace, and don't eat up the twenty seconds of screentime it takes to do it. So there's that. There's also a lot of staring on the show, but whatever. Also glacial is the pace at which the story advances. In actuality, despite the pace of the editing, there's usually a fair amount of plot laid out in each episode, it's just that the show is driven by the unfolding of a larger story and it's *that* story which oozes like molasses. Most of what happens in a given episode is circuitous and irrelevant - think Ptolemaic/Copernican epicycles instead of a nice straightforward orbital ellipse. There are about two episodes which exist because Sofie refused to give Ben a tarot reading; when he does get the reading, he gets a solid clue on where he needs to go next and takes it, advancing the plot. What happened in those intervening episodes? Uhm, a lot of cool imagery. Seriously: he tracks down a woman who turns out to be his creepy blind (?) grandmother, sees what appears to be a plaster death mask of his father, tracks down the guy who made the mask, has what appears to be a hallucination of the guy drugging him and making a mask, only it turns out that it really did happen and Brother Justin winds up getting the plaster Ben-mask in the mail. Justin holds the mask up to his face, sees through Ben's eyes for about twenty seconds, and then the mask breaks, Justin drops it, and the episode ends with a puddle of blood oozing out from the broken mask. Which looks cool, but we didn't learn ANYTHING here (well, we learned a little about Ben's grandmother, but only about ten minutes' worth). Ben doesn't get any closer to finding what he's looking for, and our time is wasted since the masks turn out to be of no importance. Also towards the end of this episode Sofie finally reads the cards, Ben has a vision of Damascus, Nebraska, and away they go, without so much as an apology for wasting our time.

And that's kind of how the plot goes. It's not an especially rewarding experience hour to hour, although there are standout episodes (Season One's "Babylon"/"Pick a Number" two-parter is mighty affecting and creepy) and lots of standout moments. The scene in the last episode where Ben uses his healing powers on as many people as he can, intentionally drawing the life force required out of a trapped Brother Justin, is exhilarating because without any effects it easily communicates the wonder of the moment, and serves as a release for the pent-up frustration of Ben being so cautious about the use of his gifts (although the healing of Jonesy from a few episodes earlier is like the warmup for this moment).

Hold on - he can heal people, but only by taking the life force from someone else? Yep: welcome to the mythology of Carnivàle. That's just one of the many cool ideas underpinning the show: Ben Hawkins is gifted with the ability to move life-force from one place to another, but he cannot create it. In the pilot episode he heals a girl crippled from birth, but the crops around her must die; he brings Jonesy back from the brink of death (and inadvertently heals his knee in the process) by getting him way out into the desert and letting Jonesy's body attract a flock of vultures, who serve as the sacrifice. This is powerful, elemental stuff, as is Brother Justin's primary power of manipulation, which early on usually takes the form of causing others to have controlled visions, particularly of their great sins.

Both Ben and Justin's powers continue to grow, because as it turns out they are the latest in a line of not-quite-human creatures called Avatars, descended from the first of their kind, a woman who lived before the Flood and is known only as the Alpha. Her descendants all have the potential to express these powers, but only the males, and only two per generation in a given line, actually manifest them. Also, one of the Avatars is a Creature of Light and the other one is a Creature of the Dark, and they are mortal enemies, but the Light/Dark aspect isn't genetic; the Light Avatar of one generation could be born to the Dark Avatar of the prior one, and vice versa. (This turns out to be the case on Carnivàle.) The seniormost living Avatar one either side is called The Prophet, and he has much greater power by virtue of his preeminence and his special blue blood, which in practice looks sort of like shower gel; the junior Avatars are called Princes, and they can only become the Prophet by killing the current title-holder (in the Light/Dark continuum, not their genetic father) in such a way that he either gives his powers up willingly or is taken by surprise and incapable of putting up psychic defenses. There will eventually be a Dark Avatar with special powers known as the Usher, as in the Usher of the Apocalypse, and there's also a shadowy figure called the Omega, which in the universe of the show everyone with knowledge of Avatars assumes the Usher and the Omega are the same, but they're actually not! (Except we never meet anyone who explicitly tells us that they're surprised to learn the Usher != the Omega, so this piece of information is useless.)

There: I've just told you roughly 45% more about the mythology of Carnivàle than you'd learn if you carefully watched every episode of Carnivàle. Eventually Ben Hawkins learns everything there is to know about the whole Avataric business, which is nice because heretofore pretty much all the characters we have access to as audience members are in the dark about it as well, but: he gets it by psychic transfer, so we never hear it explainedto him, and it continues to be mysterious! All the shit I just explained comes from show creator Dan Knaupf, who released the background on a lot of this mythology after the show was canceled. It's a lot of byzantine mythology that isn't endeared to me by being inaccessible without doing outside reading, and it's clear that Knaupf still kept a lot of stuff to himself.

For instance: the first scene of the show tells us that the first nuclear explosion (the "false sun" detonated in the desert at the Trinity test site) is a line of demarcation, when [paraphrasing now] Man forever gave up Wonder for Reason. Or something like that. Well: is that a good thing, or a bad thing, or an indifferent thing? On the one hand I'm being unfair because Knaupf only got to spill out the first third of his projected story, but on the other hand I think a lot of this mythology is uncompelling and/or poorly thought out when subjected to scrutiny, and further information would need to either retcon what we already though or keep pulling back layers to which we were never privy. So:

There's a struggle between the Light and the Dark, but the nature of these concepts aren't spelled out. Ben is provided visions of Trinity and it's implied that this is a disaster that he's supposed to stop, except that we know he didn't (they did develop a nuclear bomb), so did the Dark win? Or maybe all the characters are wrong and the Bomb/Embrace of Reason is a Good Thing, and the Light won. Except that it's not clear why either the Light or the Dark should have a vested interest in ushering (!) in modernity, when their whole gimmick relies on the deployment of magics that, by the show's own lights, have been abandoned for science. So maybe the Bomb is in fact the Nobody Wins conclusion to a deadlocked (and pointless?) struggle. There are hints, expanded on by lots of fans who've gone much deeper into the show's mythology than I particularly care to, that the show has a Gnostic concept of Light and Dark, which is to say that they're equally opposed mirror images, and not the traditional Christian (say) relationship where the Light is superior in moral strength and more powerful, necessarily triumphant. (Like I said, there are people who've gone much deeper into all of this than I'm going to, but that's part of the problem: I'm a smart guy who's fairly comfortable with a lot of the meta-mythological concepts floating around here, and the idea is that carefully watching twenty-four hours of the show and doing a few hours' worth of extracurricular reading isn't enough for me to get a handle on what's going on?) And that's an interesting idea that's pretty well borne out for the first season and change, where Ben and Justin both seem to be more complex than simply Good and Evil (although Knaupf is right to be surprised that people spent the first season wondering if they really knew who was Light and who was Dark: in the pilot episode Ben heals a girl's legs and Justin makes an old woman vomit up coins). Brother Justin eventually becomes more and more transparently Wicked, though, and the manifestations of the Dark powers are kind of goofily lopsided: when they really get going, Dark Avatars' eyes become entirely black, while Light Avatars look...the same. Also, Dark Avatars are physically disturbed when a Light Avatar makes significant use of his powers (like, Ben heals Jonesy and five hundred miles away Justin starts writhing in pain), but when the roles are flipped, there's no apparent effect on the Light side. So it would seem that the Light and the Dark aren't evenly balanced, and the Light is better, which is significantly less interesting.

Especially since the Brother Justin side of the story tends to be a lot more engaging, probably because it's simpler and less opaque. Justin is a minister gaining power and influence, he and his sister Iris have a creepy borederline incestuous relationship, Iris is torn between absolute devotion to her faith and absolute devotion to her brother (Amy Madigan's portrayal of Iris' evolution as she realizes that these two allegiances are in opposition is one of the best acting jobs on the show, actually), and lots of milk gets spilled. (Really.) Conversely, the Ben storyline, wrapped up with the carnival, is responsible for much of the boredom, long stares, and so forth. For all the ostensible attention the milieu of the carnival with its freaks and aberrations and hey they're just like normal people gets, the freaks per se play a minimal role. Samson, a dwarf (played by a dwarf) is a major character, but the only other freak with a plot is Lila the bearded lady (played by a non-bearded lady wearing a prosthetic). Several people with real physical deformities crop up (and there are minor characters played by physically normal actors who portray physical deformities), but 95% of the non-Ben carny plot is taken up with the cooch show (i.e., a family of strippers/prostitutes) and the dynamic between Jonesy and Sofie (who may or may not have mystic powers, but whose mother is one of the few carnies who does have genuine abilities), and the eventual collision of these two plotlines. In other words, there's a lot of regular people playing exactly the sort of storylines you'd get on your average relationship-drama, except with more nudity and less bathing. Yes, there was more to a carnival than the freak show, but we don't even get to see a Geek except in jittery flashbacks. Come on, now. Why bother with the carnival at all?

Labels: